I was having breakfast with my parents this morning (my mom makes this incredible baked french toast). As we were chatting, Mom said "You know, I have an idea for your blog. Why don't you discuss ..."
"Toll-free" phone charges. This one is new to me.
My parents were having compatibility problems with the interface between my mom's printer and new computer. To solve it, they called both E-Systems and Xerox and spent quite a bit of time on the phone. When they got their phone bill recently, they were surprised to find an additional $40-$60 worth of charges to numbers they didn't recognize. They immediately called the phone company to tell them there was a mistake.
No, the phone company told them. It was no mistake. Even though Mom and Dad had called E-Systems and Xerox on toll-free numbers, they were transferred to non toll-free numbers and the clock started ticking. Although my parents thought it was surely illegal, they were assured by the phone company that what those companies did was perfectly legal. They were stuck with a higher bill than they had expected, and there was nothing they could do about it.
Mom and Dad can handle it, though they're not happy about it. But what about the people who are counting every penny? Shouldn't these companies inform their customers that they're transferring them to another line that the customer will have to pay charges for? The phone company tells my parents that these companies do not have to inform the customer of this.
I've never heard of this before. It makes you wonder how they define "toll-free" any more.
About Me
- Saur♥Kraut
- Saur♥Kraut has been called The Mouth of the South.
This blog was repeatedly named one of the best blogs in the area by the (then) St. Pete Times and Tampa Tribune. After a hiatus of a little over 3 years, she has recently returned to blogging and generally annoying everyone.
Saur♥Kraut grew up in the Tampa Bay Area and, after a brief period of roaming, settled there for good... just as a tick settles on a dog. She now lives in uneasy symbiosis with the most densely populated area within the State of Florida.
Popular Posts
-
I have all these wonderful rhymes that my highly-literate family used to recite to me when I was little. Have you ever heard of any of these...
-
UPDATE 2/4/16: This article was originally written on 1/30/09 and it contains my own knowledge of a victim of a famous serial killer and how... -
CRYSTAL HEALING At one time, I would have loved to believe in Crystal Healing, and for years I considered the possibility (though I never ...
-
This is a completely juvenile post. No serious minds need to continue. I ran across this site yesterday when researching something entirel...
-
KristieD just tagged me. This is a pleasant meme , because it's short and sweet and interesting. It's not asking what my favorite c...
-
You know, I've seen many bloggers quit blogging recently, and I've heard many of you express dismay over it. But have you noticed so...
-
I have ties to the salon industry, so I know a lot about shampoos. But what I want to talk about today is the Shampoos of Ages Past. I grew...
-
First, a couple updates for those of you who've been asking : My dad is OK, and went home from the hospital on Monday. He seems to be re...
-
As I wrote in May of this year, the U.S.A. has concentration camps. But in a really unusual move, President Bush admitted to this yesterda...
-
Tony Blair (British P.M.) just went on TV to announce that one of the results which has come from the G8 conference is a doubling of aid to ...
19 comments:
I've never heard of such a thing! Wow. I think that the company should absolutely have to inform the customer! I know that some months are very very tight for me and the added expense would really cause problems.
Oh wow, I didn't think about that! Checking my bill. I just know roundabout how much it should be each month, give or take $15-$20 for my long distance charges.
Yeah, that's weird.
Wow, you would think it would fall under the rules forbidding "bait and switch" tactics. At no time were they told they were going "toll"
Phone company of course is no help. They are more than happy to collect there cut as the charges pass thru their system. They were certainly less than helpful to the folks that were caught in overseas "linejackings" a few years ago
We are the phone company, here to help you. Uh huh, yup, anyone seen the Tooth Fairey around here?
weird! I never thought that something like that could happen!
Oh, I would have been LIVID!
But I don't have a home phone anymore just a cell and work pays for it so I can't complain.
It does somehow seem illegal and fraudulent to have someone dial a "toll-free" number and then to charge them.
Thanks for the information on this. The next time I find myself in that position I will definitely ask if the number I'm being transfered to is a toll number. It does seem really slimey.
Saur - Did they call the Public Service Commission to complain?
I've never heard of that before. I'd be on the phone with the company (using a different number, of course) and demand my money back.
Then I'd call Channel 8. They love this kind of stuff.
Ditto on everyone else's comments. My DH regularly scans the phone numbers to check the numbers, but we've not seen this issue before. We'll have to look for it.
When people use to try to take advantage of my mom, I use to nail them to a wall.
Saur, I'm not happy with your picture, sure there is no underarm flab but your skin is so pale. Keep looking.
Mr. Gator, yes, I intend to look into it myself on Monday. So you don't like the pic, huh? I'll keep hunting about. I did like the green (saurkraut) but no one really like the real psychedelic pic of me.
Always Questioning, they didn't, but it's a good idea.
Fred, also a good idea. Thanks! I always believe in raising a fuss when possible. I don't know if my folks want that, though. I'll encourage them to do it though!
Dddragon, Eddo, Godless Mom, Bananarama, Dan, Smilesalot, & TC, it is infuriating, isn't it? This has to be illegal.
Mallory, what's linejacking?
Geez, THAT's scary and horrible! Good grief.
Saur, linejacking was the con that was going on for a time where a con artist would call a number, claim to be from the phone company running a test and needed the homeowner to enter a code and hang up. At that point the con artist had control of the phone line and could do what they wanted including hitting over seas 900 numbers and running up charges in the thousands
Saur, I sincerely doubt the legality of this operation, unless the customer is advised at the time of transfer that toll charges will be assessed. The PUC (Public Utilities Commission) has jurisdiction over these complaints. The threat of a class action can also be wonderously effective. There are only too many hungry plaintiff lawyers who would salivate over a claim like this.
Good luck!
Mallory, Ahh, now I recall what you're talking about. Thanks!
Bill, I appreciate it. I'll call the PUC on Monday.
Acton Bell, you're right. But those conversations will get confusing too, because I can just see us having to ask each and every person we're transferred to...
That is news to me. Somehow it does not sound right, but the part were they blame the owner of the phone does.
This is a common practice in the help-wanted section of most newspapers. People desperate for a job dial an 800 number and are quickly transferred to some pre-recorded hype. A friend payed $100 for this "bait and switch".
Tshsmom WOW. Thanks for sharing. How awful! Talk about preying on people...
Post a Comment